Integração entre Psicologia Social e Design Sustentável na promoção de hábitos ecológicos

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36704/transverso.v1i17.10290

Palavras-chave:

psicologia social, normas sociais, design sustentável, sustentabilidade

Resumo

O presente artigo examina de que maneira teorias da psicologia social contribuem para compreender tanto a adesão quanto a resistência em relação a práticas sustentáveis, destacando o papel do design na superação de barreiras de ordem psicológica e social. Metodologicamente, adota-se uma revisão narrativa de literatura, fundamentada em autores como Cialdini, Moscovici, Stern, Flusser, Bauman e Maldonado, e que contempla noções como normas sociais, influência social, representações ambientais e percepção do risco ecológico. A análise discute como o design pode intervir na transformação de comportamentos, considerando o impacto de normas descritivas e injuntivas na promoção de práticas sustentáveis, por meio de mecanismos como simplificação de escolhas, fortalecimento da identidade social e uso de estratégias de gamificação. Também se aponta como a lógica do consumo acelerado representa um obstáculo à consolidação de valores ambientais. Além disso, são exploradas as relações entre cultura, sociedade e técnica na configuração de novos padrões de consumo. Conclui-se que o design se apresenta como recurso estratégico na transição para práticas mais sustentáveis, ao torná-las acessíveis, intuitivas e socialmente reconhecidas. Ao articular dimensões psicológicas e sociais, o design mostra-se capaz de transformar representações ambientais e incentivar hábitos sustentáveis de maneira eficaz.

Referências

AGUIAR-CASTILLO, L.; RAJENDRA-TELI, S.; PEREZ-JIMENEZ, R. Gamification and proenvironmental performance: could tourists return home with more sustainable habits? Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, v. 14, n. 3, p. 444–459, 2023. Disponível em: https://www.emerald.com/jhtt/article/14/3/444/431737/Gamification-and-proenvironmental-performance. Acesso em: 14 out. 2025.

ALLCOTT, H. Social norms and energy conservation. Journal of Public Economics, v. 95, n. 9–10, p. 1082–1095, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.03.003.

ALLCOTT, H.; ROGERS, T. The short-run and long-run effects of behavioral interventions: experimental evidence from energy conservation. American Economic Review, v. 104, n. 10, p. 3003–3037, 2014. DOI: 10.1257/aer.104.10.3003.

ANDRE, P. et al. Globally representative evidence on the actual and perceived support for climate action. Nature Climate Change, v. 14, p. 253–259, 2024. DOI: 10.1038/s41558-024-01925-3.

BASTOS, F.; MERCEA, A. O papel das redes sociais na promoção de práticas sustentáveis e seu impacto na mudança comportamental. 2019.

BAUMAN, Z. A cultura na era da modernidade líquida. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 2001.

BAUMAN, Z. Ensaios sobre o conceito de cultura. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 2011.

BERGQUIST, M.; NILSSON, A. A meta-analysis of field-experiments using social norms to promote pro-environmental behaviors. Global Environmental Change, v. 59, 101941, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101941.

BICCHIERI, C.; DIMANT, E. Nudging with care: the risks and benefits of social information. Public Choice, v. 191, n. 3–4, p. 443–484, 2022. DOI: 10.1007/s11127-019-00684-6.

BONAN, J.; CATTANEO, C.; D’ADDA, G.; TAVONI, M. Social interaction and peer effects in energy conservation: a randomized field experiment. Nature Energy, v. 5, p. 615–625, 2020. DOI: 10.1038/s41560-020-00721-7.

BUVÁR, Á.; ZSILA, Á.; OROSZ, G. Non-green influencers promoting sustainable consumption: dynamic norms enhance the credibility of authentic pro-environmental posts. Frontiers in Psychology, v. 14, 1112762, 2023. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1112762.

CHEN, X.; KNIGHT, C. Investigating social norms and personal norms in pro-environmental behaviors. Energy Research & Social Science, 2022.

CIALDINI, R. B. Influence: science and practice. 4. ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 2001.

CIALDINI, R. B.; JACOBSON, R. P. A focus theory of normative conduct and pro-environmental behavior. In: STEG, L.; DE GROOT, J. I. M. (org.). Environmental psychology: an introduction. 3. ed. Hoboken: Wiley, 2021, p. 201–220.

CIALDINI, R. B.; JACOBSON, R. P. Influences of social norms on climate change-related behaviors. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, v. 42, p. 1–8, 2021.

CONDE, Júlio; TAKANO-ROJAS, Harumi. Rethinking energy transition: approaches from social representations theory. Energy Research & Social Science, v. 122, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2025.104001.

DÉZMA, L. et al. Social representation of global climate change: an exploratory study focusing on emotions. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, v. 38, n. 2, 2024. DOI: 10.1080/10720537.2024.2310828.

DIGITAL NUDGING. Digital nudging for sustainable tourist behavior in new media. Tourism Management, v. 107, 105087, abr. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.tourman.2024.105087.

DO, V. T. H.; DO, L. T. The effectiveness of social norms in promoting green consumption. Social Responsibility Journal, v. 20, n. 3, p. 444–461, 2023. DOI: 10.1108/SRJ-10-2022-0466.

FLUSSER, V. Uma filosofia do design: a forma das coisas. Lisboa: Relógio D’Água, 2010.

FUNK, S. H. Empowering voices, shaping futures: digital storytelling for sustainable transformation. International Journal of Science and Research Archive, v. 13, n. 1, p. 1345–1359, 2024. DOI: 10.30574/ijsra.2024.13.1.1827.

GOLOB, U.; PODNAR, K.; WEDER, F. Reimagining the sustainable consumer: why social representations of sustainable consumption matter. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, v. 33, n. 4, p. 847-859, 2024. Disponível em: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/beer.12656.

GUERRA, G. C. M.; ICHIKAWA, E. Y. A institucionalização de representações sociais: uma proposta de integração teórica. REGE – Revista de Gestão, v. 18, n. 3, p. 339–359, 2011.

HELFERICH, M.; THØGERSEN, J.; BERGQUIST, M. Direct and mediated impacts of social norms on pro-environmental behavior. Global Environmental Change, v. 80, 102680, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2023.102680.

HOSTA, M.; ZABKAR, V. Antecedents of environmentally and socially responsible sustainable consumer behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, v. 171, n. 2, p. 273–293, 2020.

KAHAN, D. M.; JENKINS-SMITH, H.; BRAMAN, D. Cultural cognition of scientific consensus. Journal of Risk Research, v. 14, n. 2, 147–174, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2010.511246.

KARLGREN, J. et al. Socially intelligent interfaces for increased energy awareness in the home. ArXiv, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2106.15297. Disponível em: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2106.15297.

KIM, S. H.; SEOCK, Y. K. The roles of values and social norm on personal norms and pro-environmentally friendly apparel product purchasing behavior: the mediating role of personal norms. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, v. 51, p. 83–90, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.05.023.

LIQUID CONSUMPTION REVIEWS. Revisões críticas sobre consumo líquido e implicações para práticas sustentáveis. 2020–2023.

MALDONADO, T. Cultura, sociedade e técnica. São Paulo: Ed. Edgar Blucher, 2012.

MDPI STUDY. Design for sustainable behaviour: an exploratory study in schools’ washrooms. Sustainability, v. 17, n. 3, 1219, 2023. DOI: 10.3390/su17031219.

MOSCOVICI, S. A psicologia das minorias ativas. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 1978.

MORSCHHEUSER, B.; KRATH, J.; VON KORFLESCH, H. Designing gamification for sustainable employee behavior: insights on employee motivations, design features and gamification elements. In: 55th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Honolulu. Anais […], 2022. Honolulu: University of Hawaii, 2022. Disponível em: https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/items/bb3c12ef-de50-4ba7-9043-d25ee68469b5.

NIEMIEC, R. M. et al. Social norms and the promotion of conservation behavior: the moderating role of visibility. Conservation Biology, v. 33, n. 3, p. 547–558, 2019.

OREA-GINER, M.; FUSTÉ-FORNÉ, F. Applying the VBN model to green consumerism in Indonesia. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 2025.

PIMENTEL, A. K. O. et al. Maslow e o meio ambiente: integrando representação social e a teoria das necessidades e motivações. Ambiente & Sociedade, v. 27, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4422asoc0147r1vu27L2AO. Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/j/asoc/a/jpk4kr6H9sd8F4SDnzLpK5k/?format=pdf&lang=pt.

REQUENA-I-MORA, M. Social representations of the environment and socio-metabolic regimes: the case of the Spanish state. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, v. 7, n. 1, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/25148486231169208.

SAVCHENKO, O. M. et al. Encouraging pro-environmental behavior: do testimonials by experts work?. PLOS ONE, v. 18, n. 10, e0291612, 2023. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291612.

SCHERER, K.; SANTOS, A. dos. Design for sustainable behaviour: reflections on cultural cooking habits for sustainable innovation in the household appliance sector. e-Revista LOGO, v. 12, n. 1, 2023. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/erevistalogo/article/download/106074/59322/414139.

SEIDLER, A. R.; HENKEL, C.; FIEDLER, M.; KRANZ, J. Promoting eco-sustainable behavior with gamification: an experimental study on the alignment of competing goals. In: Internacional Conference on Information Systems, 41., 2020, India. Anais […]. 2020. Disponível em: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344785282_Promoting_Eco-Sustainable_Behavior_with_Gamification_An_Experimental_Study_on_the_Alignment_of_Competing_Goals.

SHIN, H. D.; BULL, R. Three dimensions of design for sustainable behaviour. Sustainability, v. 11, n. 17, 4610, 2019. DOI: 10.3390/su11174610.

SOVACOOL, B. K. et al. Temporality, vulnerability, and energy justice in household low carbon innovations. Energy Policy, v. 128, p. 495-504, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.01.010.

SPARKMAN, G.; WALTON, G. M. Dynamic norms promote sustainable behavior, even when only a minority engages in it. Psychological Science, v. 28, n. 11, p. 1663–1674, 2017. DOI: 10.1177/0956797617719950.

STERN, P. C. et al. A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: the case of environmentalism. Washington, DC: National Research Council, 2011.

SUSTAINABILITY. Gamification for sustainability: a systematic review of applications, trends, and opportunities. Computers in Human Behavior, v. 165, 108529, 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2024.108529.

UPHAM, Paul; SCHOLTE, Rianne; FERON, Sarah. Social representations of injustice in sustainability transitions. Frontiers in Political Science, v. 7, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2025.1501904.

VAN RIPER, C. J.; KYLE, G. Capturing multiple values of ecosystem services shaped by environmental worldviews: A spatial analysis. Journal of Environmental Management, v. 145, p. 374-384, 2014. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0301479714003156?via%3Dihub.

VISUAL FEEDBACK META-ANALYSIS. Understanding visual feedback mechanism from three-dimensional of information, time and display: a meta-analysis of feedback research for household electricity conservation. Energy and Buildings, v. 316, 114297, 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2024.114297.

WEDER, F.; GOLOB, U.; PODNAR, K. Sustainable consumption in context: a cross-cultural study of social representations. Sustainability, v. 17, n. 4, art. 1531, 2025. DOI: 10.3390/su17041531.

WILSON, S. L.; YANG, M. C. User-informed LLM learning: identifying effective design features for sustainable behavior through AI perception. Proceedings of the Design Society, v. 5, p. 3331–3340, 2025. DOI: 10.1017/pds.2025.10347.

YOUNG, Sydney; GUPTA, Udit; HESTER, Josiah. Empowering Users to Make Sustainability-Forward Decisions for Computing Services. Communications of the ACM, v. 68, n. 7, p. 80-85, 2023.

Downloads

Publicado

28-11-2025

Como Citar

Oliveira, G., Magalhães Viana , D., & Maynardes, A. C. (2025). Integração entre Psicologia Social e Design Sustentável na promoção de hábitos ecológicos. Revista Transverso, 1(17). https://doi.org/10.36704/transverso.v1i17.10290

Edição

Seção

Artigos Científicos ou Tecnológicos