REGENERATIVE EDUCATION AND EXPERIMENTAL GOVERNANCE

UNIVERSITIES AS INSTITUTIONAL INFRASTRUCTURES FOR PUBLIC CAPACITY BUILDING

Authors

  • Patricia Mello Fundação Getulio Vargas - Escola de Direito SP
  • Erika Lisboa
  • Claudia Oshiro

Keywords:

Regenerative education; Experimental governance; Public capacity Building; Action research; Evidence-based public policy.

Abstract

This article examines how public capacity regeneration can be promoted when education is conceived as an institutional and governance infrastructure. Drawing on theories of experimental governance, law in action, and institutional capacity building, the study argues that universities can operate as regenerative devices by integrating problem-oriented pedagogy, theory of change, and territorially situated interventions. Using insider action research conducted within the context of FGV Cidades, the article analyzes an applied educational experiment in the field of sustainable public-private action, focused on addressing complex urban-environmental challenges at the subnational level. Empirical evidence derives from institutional documents, participant observation, and reflexive artifacts generated throughout the training process, particularly the logical models developed by participating teams. The findings demonstrate how education can function as a social and institutional technology capable of activating inter-institutional collaboration, reorganizing legal-economic-operational arrangements, and strengthening public capacities in fragmented policy environments. The article concludes by proposing a replicable analytical framework for regenerative educational practices oriented toward evidence-based and territorially grounded public policy solutions.

References

Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571.

Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1996). Organizational Learning II: Theory, Method, and Practice. Addison-Wesley.

Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2012). Mode 3 Knowledge Production in Quadruple Helix Innovation Systems: 21st-Century Democracy, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship for Development. Springer.

Chen, H. T. (2005). Practical Program Evaluation: Assessing and Improving Planning, Implementation, and Effectiveness. Sage Publications.

Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation. Pergamon.

Coghlan, D. (2019). Doing Action Research in Your Own Organization (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

Dewey, J. (1927). The Public and Its Problems. Henry Holt and Company.

Dewey, J. (1938). Logic: The Theory of Inquiry. Henry Holt and Company.

Eden, C., & Huxham, C. (1996). Action research for the study of organizations. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of Organization Studies (pp. 526–542). Sage Publications.

Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123.

Farah, M. F. S. (2017). Capacidades estatais e inovação em governos locais no Brasil. Revista de Administração Pública, 51(5), 788–814.

Funnell, S. C., & Rogers, P. J. (2011). Purposeful Program Theory: Effective Use of Theories of Change and Logic Models. Jossey-Bass.

Godin, B. (2006). The Linear Model of Innovation: The Historical Construction of an Analytical Framework. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 31(6), 639–667.

Heclo, H. (1974). Modern Social Politics in Britain and Sweden: From Relief to Income Maintenance. Yale University Press.

König, A. (Ed.). (2013). Regenerative Sustainable Development of Universities and Cities: The Role of Living Labs. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46.

Llewellyn, K. N. (1930). The Bramble Bush: On Our Law and Its Study. Oceana Publications.

Mazzucato, M. (2018). The Value of Everything: Making and Taking in the Global Economy. Hachette.

Mazzucato, M., & Kattel, R. (2020). COVID-19 and public-sector capacity. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 36(Supplement_1), S256–S269.

Pires, R. R. C., & Gomide, A. A. (2021). Capacidades estatais e inovação em políticas públicas: Abordagens, dimensões analíticas e experiências no Brasil. Revista do Serviço Público, 72(3), 451–474.

Sabel, C. F., & Simon, W. H. (2004). Destabilization rights: How public law litigation succeeds. Harvard Law Review, 117(4), 1015–1101.

Sabel, C. F., & Zeitlin, J. (2012). Experimentalist governance. In D. Levi-Faur (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Governance (pp. 169–183). Oxford University Press.

Schön, D. A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books.

Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, “translations” and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420.

Taplin, D. H., & Clark, H. (2012). Theory of Change Basics: A Primer on Theory of Change. Actknowledge.

Trencher, G., Yarime, M., McCormick, K. B., Doll, C. N. H., & Kraines, S. B. (2023). Beyond the third mission: Exploring the emerging university function of co-creation for sustainability. Science and Public Policy, 50(1), 48–62.

Weber, K. M., & Rohracher, H. (2012). Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change: Combining insights from innovation systems and multi-level perspective in a comprehensive ‘failures’ framework. Research Policy, 41(6), 1037–1047.

Weiss, C. H. (1998). Evaluation: Methods for Studying Programs and Policies (2nd ed.). Prentice Hall.

Published

2025-12-19

How to Cite

Mello, P., Lisboa, E., & Oshiro, C. (2025). REGENERATIVE EDUCATION AND EXPERIMENTAL GOVERNANCE: UNIVERSITIES AS INSTITUTIONAL INFRASTRUCTURES FOR PUBLIC CAPACITY BUILDING . Perspectives on Public Policies, 18(36), 399–417. Retrieved from https://revista.uemg.br/revistappp/article/view/10605