THE CHOICE FOR THE SOCIAL ORGANIZATIONS MODEL IN THE FINANCING OF SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION

Authors

  • Andrea Cabello UnB
  • Natália Vieira

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36704/ppp.v15i30.7178

Keywords:

Social Organizations, Finance of ST&I, Administrative Reform

Abstract

The creation of Social Organizations (OSs) in Brazil is linked to a series of structural reforms that occurred in the 1990s. They were mainly adopted in the area of ​​Health in the states and municipalities and, in the Federal Government in Science, Technology and Innovation (CT&I) . In 2022, there are 6 ST&I OSs linked to the Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MCTI). The article analyzes the impact of the adoption of this form of management in the financing of this area, considering the international experience.

References

ABRUCIO, F. L. Os avanços e os dilemas do modelo pós-burocrático: a reforma da administração pública à luz da experiência internacional recente. Reforma do Estado e administração pública gerencial, 7, 173-200, 1998.

BOEKHOLT, P. e DEN HERTOG, P. “Shaking Up the Dutch Innovation System: How to Overcome Inertia in Governance”, In: OECD Governance of Innovation Systems, Vol. 2: Case Studies in Innovation Policy, OECD, 2005.

BORRÁS, S. The widening and deepening of innovation policy: What conditions provide for effective governance?. Georgia Institute of Technology, 2008.

BRASIL, Reforma do Estado para a cidadania: a reforma gerencial brasileira na perspectiva internacional. São Paulo: Editora 34, 1998

BRASIL, Orçamento Público. Conceitos Básicos. Módulo 5. Noções de Execução Orçamentária. ENAP, 2014.

BRAUN, D. Who governs intermediary agencies? Principal-agent relations in research policy-making. Journal of Public Policy, 135-162, 1993. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X00000994

BRAUN, D. Organising the political coordination of knowledge and innovation policies. Science and public policy, 35(4), 227-239, 2008a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3152/030234208X287056

BRAUN, D. Lessons on the political coordination of knowledge and innovation policies. Science and Public Policy, 35(4), 289-298, 2008b. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3152/030234208X310347

CAMPOS, A. e CAMACHO, D. Regulação Econômica do Setor Petrolífero no Brasil: Análise das Ações da ANP no período de 1997 a 2008. Revista de Administração da Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, 7(3), 422-441. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5902/198346598660

FERNANDES, L. SOARES, G., TURINO, F., BUSSINGUER, E., & SODRÉ, F. Recursos humanos em hospitais estaduais gerenciados por organizações sociais de saúde: a lógica do privado. Trabalho, Educação e Saúde, 16(3), 955-973, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-7746-sol00140

GORDON, J. STALLIVEIRI, F. Embrapii: um novo modelo de apoio técnico e financeiro à inovação no Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Inovação. v. 18, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20396/rbi.v18i2.8653648

HÄYRINEN-ALESTALO, M., PELKONEN, A. TERÄVÄINEN, T. E VILLANEN, S. “Changing Governance for Innovation Policy Integration in Filand”, In: OECD, Governance of Innovation Systems, Vol. 2: Case Studies in Innovation Policy, OECD, 2005.

HILLARD, R. E GREEN, R. “Governance and Institutional Change in Ireland”, In: OECD, Governance of Innovation Systems, Vol. 2: Case Studies in Innovation Policy, OECD, 2005.

HONG, Y. “Evolution of the Korean National Innovation System: Towards an Integrated Model”, In: OECD, Governance of Innovation Systems, Vol. 2: Case Studies in Innovation Policy, OECD, 2005.

IBANEZ, N., BITTAR, O., SÁ, E. YAMAMOTO, E., ALMEIDA, M., & CASTRO, C. Organizações sociais de saúde: o modelo do Estado de São Paulo. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 6, 391-404, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232001000200009

KOCH, C. The superministry approach: integrated governance of science, technology and innovation with contracted autonomy. Science and Public Policy, 35(4), 253-264, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3152/030234208X307792

LAROUSSE, J. “Towards a Third-Generation Innovation Policy in Flanders: Policy Profile of the Flemish Innovation System”, In: In: OECD, Governance of Innovation Systems, Vol. 2: Case Studies in Innovation Policy, OECD, 2005.

MOREIRA, M., e AZEVEDO, P. Risco de Captura por Assimetria de Informação em Agência Reguladora por Mercado Regulado. XLIII Encontro da ANPAD - EnANPAD 2019, São Paulo, 2019.

MELO, L. Financiamento à Inovação no Brasil: análise da aplicação dos recursos do Fundo Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (FNDCT) e da Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos (FINEP) de 1967 a 2006. Revista Brasileira de Inovação, 8(1), 87-120, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20396/rbi.v8i1.8648976

OECD (2005a) Governance of Innovation Systems, Vol. 2: Case Studies in Innovation Policy, OECD, 2005a.

OECD (2005b) Governance of Innovation Systems, Vol. 1: Synthesis Report, OECD, 2005b.

PACHECO, H. , GURGEL JÚNIOR, G., SANTOS, F, FERREIRA, S. & LEAL, E. Organizações sociais como modelo de gestão da assistência à saúde em Pernambuco, Brasil: percepção de gestores. Interface-Comunicação, Saúde, Educação, 20, 585-595, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-57622015.0338

PELKONEN, A., TERÄVÄINEN, T., & WALTARI, S. T. Assessing policy coordination capacity: higher education, science, and technology policies in Finland. Science and Public Policy, 35(4), 241-252, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3152/030234208X308854

PEREIRA, L. Gestão do setor público: estratégia e estrutura para um novo Estado. Reforma do Estado e administração pública gerencial, 1, 21-38, 1998.

PILOTTO, B. E JUNQUEIRA, V. Organizações Sociais do setor de saúde no estado de São Paulo: avanços e limites do controle externo. Serv. Soc. Soc., São Paulo , n. 130, p. 547-563, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-6628.123

REMOE, S. “Governing Fragmentation: The Case of Norway”, In: OECD, Governance of Innovation Systems, Vol. 2: Case Studies in Innovation Policy, OECD, 2005.

SCHIOZAWA, B. E ICHIKAWA, T. “Japan’s Industrial Technology and Innovation Policies and the Effects of ‘Agencification’”, In: OECD, Governance of Innovation Systems, Vol. 2: Case Studies in Innovation Policy, OECD, 2005.

THORSLUNG, J., ELG, L. E SANDGREN, P., “The end of an era? Governance of Swedish Innovation Policy”, In: OECD, Governance of Innovation Systems, Vol. 2: Case Studies in Innovation Policy, OECD, 2005.

TSIPOURI, L. E PAPADAKOU, M. “Profiling and Assessing Innovation Governance in Greece: Do Increased Funding and the Modernisation of Governance Co-evolve?”, In: OECD, Governance of Innovation Systems, Vol. 2: Case Studies in Innovation Policy, OECD, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264035720-8-en

WILLIAMS, J. “Frameworks for Horizontal Innovation Policy in New Zealand”, In: OECD (2005) Governance of Innovation Systems, Vol. 2: Case Studies in Innovation Policy, OECD, 2005.

Published

2022-12-28

How to Cite

Cabello, A., & Vieira, N. (2022). THE CHOICE FOR THE SOCIAL ORGANIZATIONS MODEL IN THE FINANCING OF SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION . Perspectives on Public Policies, 15(30), 123–158. https://doi.org/10.36704/ppp.v15i30.7178

Issue

Section

Artigos