A recuperação lexical e o fenômeno “ponta dos dedos” na Libras
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36704/sciasls.v1i1.6855Keywords:
Libras, Ponta dos dedos, Recuperação lexical, língua de sinaisAbstract
Os objetivos desta pesquisa são: analisar e discutir como ocorre a busca por sinais-alvo na recuperação lexical de pessoas surdas que utilizam a Libras como língua principal; verificar a ocorrência do fenômeno “ponta dos dedos” (TOF, do inglês tip of the fingers); e descrever os aspectos fonológicos durante a ocorrência do fenômeno. Para atingir os objetivos da pesquisa foi realizado um teste com 34 adultos/as surdos/as, que consistia na sinalização de nomes próprios de celebridades e de cidades do mundo. Enquanto visualizavam as imagens dessas pessoas/ lugares, os/as participantes deveriam dizer se sabiam o sinal ou se estavam experienciando o TOF. Neste último caso, o/a participante deveria sinalizar tudo o que recuperava do sinal- alvo naquele momento do TOF. Foram apresentados 69 estímulos por participante, resultando em 2346 estímulos totais e, como resultado, observou-se a ocorrência de 20 TOFs (0.9% dos estímulos). Em todos os casos, pelo menos um aspecto fonético-fonológico foi recuperado no momento do TOF, sendo o parâmetro movimento o menos recuperado. Esse fato pode indicar que os parâmetros localização, configuração de mão e orientação manual constituem o onset silábico na estrutura de formação do sinal.
Palavras-chave:
Libras; Ponta dos dedos; recuperação lexical; língua de sinais.
References
BARBOSA, F. V; NEVES, S. L. G; BARBOSA, A. F. Política Linguística e ensino de português como segunda língua. In: ALBRES, N. A; NEVES, S. L. G (orgs). Libras em Estudo: Política Educacional, Feneis, p. 119-138, 2013.
BATTISON, R. Phonological Deletion in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, Washington DC, v. 5, 1974 p. 1-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.1974.0005
BIERDMANN, B; RUH, N; NICKELS, L; COLTHEART, M. Information Retrieval in Tip of the Tongue States: New Data and Methodological Advances. J Psycholinguist Res, 37, p. 171–198, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-007-9065-8
BORODKIN, K; FAUST, M. Word Retrieval in Developmental Language Impairments: Application of the Tip-of-the-Tongue Paradigm. In: FAUST, M (org.) The Handbook of the Neuropsychology of Language. UK: Wiley-Blackwell, pg. 959- 979, 2015.
BRENNEN, T; VIKAN, A; DYBDAHL, R. Are tip of the tongue states universal? Evidence from speakers of an unwritten language. Memory, 15 (2), p. 167-176, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210601164743
BRENTARI, D. The Uses of Orientation in Agreement Morphology, 1998 Disponível em: <https://www.sign-lang.uni-hamburg.de/intersign/workshop2/brentari/> Acesso em Set/2018.
__________. Sign Language Phonology. In: GOLDSMITH, J; RIGGLE, J; YU, A. C. L. The Handbook of Phonological Theory. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell, p.691-721, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444343069.ch21
BROWN, R.; MCNEILL, D. The ‘‘tip of the tongue’’ phenomenon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, p. 325-337, 1966. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(66)80040-3
BROWN, A. S. A Review of the Tip of the Tongue Experience. Psychological Bulletin. Vol. 109, n. 2, p. 204-223, 1991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.204
__________. The tip of the tongue state. Psychology Press: New York, 2012.
BROWN, S. R. Tip-of-the-Tongue Phenomena: An Introductory Phenomenological Analysis. Consciousness and Cognition 9, p. 516–537, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/ccog.2000.0421
BURKE, D. M et al. On the tip of the tongue: what causes word finding failures in young and older adults? Journal of memory and language, 30, p. 542-79, 1991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(91)90026-G
DELL, G. S. A spreading-activation model of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review 91, 283–321, 1986. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.93.3.283
ELAN (Version 5.2) [Computer software]. (2018, April 04). Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics. Retrieved from https://tla.mpi.nl/tools/tla-tools/elan/
GARRETT, M.F. Processes in language production. In: NIEUMEYER, F.J. (Ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, Biological and Psychological Aspects of Language, vol. 3. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 69–96, 1988. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621062.004
__________. Sentence processing. In.: Osherson, D.N & Lasnick, H. An Invitation to Cogntive Science, Vol. 1: Language. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 1990.
GOLLAN, T. H; BROWN, A. S. From Tip-of-the-Tongue (TOT) Data to Theoretical Implications in Two Steps: When More TOTs Means Better Retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, Vol. 135, n. 3, p. 462– 483, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.135.3.462
JAMES, W. The principles of psychology, Vol. 1.New York: Holt, 1890. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/10538-000
JAMES, L. E; BURKE, D. M. Phonological Priming Effects on Word Retrieval and Tip-pf the tongue Experiences in young and older adults. In: Journal of experimental psychology: learning, memory and cognition. Vol. 26, n. 6, p. 1378-91, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.26.6.1378
LEVELT, W. J. M. Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1989.
__________. Accessing words in speech production: Stages, processes and representations. Cognition, 42, p. 1-22, 1992. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(92)90038-J
__________. The skill of speaking. In: BERTELSON, P. EELEN, P & D'YDEWALLE, G. (Eds.), International perspectives on psychological science: Vol. 1. Leading themes (pp. 89-103). Hove: Erlbaum, 1994.
__________. Spoken word production: A theory of lexical access. PNAS ,98 (23), p. 13464-71, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.231459498
LEVELT, W. J. M; ROELOFS, A; MEYER, A. S. A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and brain sciences, p. 1–75, 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99001776
LIDDELL, S. K; JOHNSON, R. E. American Sign Language: The phonological base. Sign Language Studies, v. 64, p. 197-277, 1989. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.1989.0027
__________. Grammar, Gesture and Meaning in American Sign Language. NY: Cambridge, 2003.
MARIL, A; WAGNER, A, D; SHACTER, D, L. On the Tip of the Tongue: An Event-Related fMRI Study of Semantic Retrieval Failure and Cognitive Conflict. Neuron, Vol. 31, p. 653–660, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00396-8
METCALFE, J; SCHWARTZ, B. L; BLOOM, P. A. The tip-of-the-tongue state and curiosity. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2:31, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-017-0065-4
MEYER, A. S.; BOCK, K. The tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon: blocking or partial activation? Memory and Cognition. 20 (6). 215-706. 1992. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202721
OLIVEIRA, M. V. B. Aspectos teórico-metodológicos do fenômeno referido como palavras na ponta da língua. Estudos Linguísticos. São Paulo, 42 (2): p. 889-902, 2013.
__________. Palavras na ponta-da-língua: uma abordagem neurolinguística. Tese (Doutorado e Linguística). Instituto de Estudos da Linguagem, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, 2015.
RASTLE, K.G., & BURKe, D.M. Priming the tip of the tongue: Effects of prior
processing on word retrieval in young and older adults. Journal of Memory and
Language, 35, 586–605, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1996.0031
SANDLER, W. The spreading hand autosegment of american sign language. Sign language Studies, v. 50, p. 1-28, 1986. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.1986.0006
__________. Hierarchical organization of phonological features in American Sign Language. Parasession on Autosegmental and Metrical Phonology. Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago, 1987.
__________. Phonological representation of the sign: linearity and non-linearity in American Sign Language. Dordrecht: Foris, 1989
__________. The Phonological Organization of Sign Languages. Lang Linguist Compass, v. 6 (3), p. 162- 182, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/lnc3.326
SANDLER, W. LILLO-MARTIN, D. Sign Langague and linguistic universals. NY: Cambridge, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139163910
SCHERMER, T; PFAU, R. Psycholinguistics. In: BAKER, A; BOGAERDE, B. V. D; PFAU, R; SCHERMER, T (eds). The Linguistics of Sign Language. An introduction. John Benjamins, p.25-50 , 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/z.199.02sch
SCHWARTZ, B. L. Illusory Tip-of-the-tongue States. Memory. 6 (6), p. 623 – 642, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/741943371
__________. Sparkling at the end of the tongue: The etiology of tip-of-the-tongue phenomenology. In: Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. Vol. 6, n. 3, p. 379-393, 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210827
__________. Tip of the Tongue States: Phenomenology, mechanism, and lexical retrieval. New Jersey: LEA, 2002.
__________. Tip-oh-the-tongue states as metacognition. In: Metacognition Learning. Vol. 1, n. 2, p. 149-158, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-006-9583-z
__________. The effect of being in a tip-of-the-tongue state on subsequent items. Mem Cogn, 39, p. 245–250, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-010-0020-9
SCHWARTZ, B. L; METCALFE, J. Tip-of the tongue (TOT) states: retrieval, Behavior, and experience. In: Memory & Cognition, Vol. 39, n. 5, p. 737-49, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-010-0066-8
STOKOE, W. Sign language structure: An outline of the visual communication systems of the American deaf. Studies in Linguistics: Occasional papers, v. 8, 1960.
STOKOE, W. Semantic phonology. Sign Language Studies, 71, 107–114, 1991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.1991.0032
THOMPSON, R; EMMOREY, K; GOLLAN, T. H. “Tip of the Finguers” experiences by Deaf Signers – Insights into the organization of a Sign-Based Lexicon. American Psychological Society, Vol 16, n. 11, p. 856-60, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01626.x
WILBUR, R. B. Phonological and prosodic layering of nonmanuals in American Sign Language. In EMMOREY K.; LANE HARLAN. The signs of language revisited: na anthology to honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associatess, 2000.
XAVIER, A. N. Descrição fonético-fonológica dos sinais da Língua de Sinais Brasileira (Libras). Dissertação (metrado em linguística) – Faculdade de Filosofia Letras e Ciências Humanas, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2006.
__________. Uma ou duas? Eis a questão!: Um estudo do parâmetro número de mãos na produção de sinais da Língua Brasileira de Sinais (Libras). Tese (Doutorado em linguística) – Instituto de Estudos da Linguagem, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, 2014.
