Reconfiguring classroom layout as a tool for inclusion and equity in mathematics education

Visualizações: 9

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36704/eef.v29i57.9089

Keywords:

Justice, Equality, Pedagogical Practices, Active Methodologies, Engagement

Abstract

This study examines how physical classroom design can promote equity and inclusion in mathematics education. The research explores the reconfiguration of classroom layout as a tool to create more collaborative and contextualized environments. Active learning methods, direct observation, and the use of the digital platform Matific are used to evaluate the impact of these changes. The results suggest that reorganizing the physical space facilitates interaction among students and allows pedagogical practices to be adapted to individual needs. It is concluded that adjustments to the classroom layout, combined with ongoing teacher training, can reduce educational inequalities and increase student engagement in mathematical learning. It also highlights the importance of accessible, well-planned environments that integrate students with different abilities and learning styles, promoting a more equitable educational experience.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Leandro Rodolfo Prado Lessa, Universidade de Taubaté

Master’s student in Professional Education at the University of Taubaté (MPE – UNITAU), focusing on the research line of "Pedagogical Practices for Equity." Graduated in Mathematics from FABRAS - IBRA College of Brasília, currently teaching elementary and high school in the State Education Network of São Paulo.

Willian José Ferreira, Universidade de Taubaté

Professor and Researcher in the Professional Master's Program in Education at the University of Taubaté (MPE – UNITAU). He holds a degree in Physics from São Paulo State University (UNESP), a Master's in Environmental Sciences from the University of Taubaté (UNITAU), and a PhD in Space Geophysics from the National Institute for Space Research (INPE). He also participates in the Teacher Specialization Program (PED Brasil), an initiative of the Lemann Center for Educational Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Brazil, located at the Stanford Graduate School of Education, developed in partnership with the Instituto Canoa. 

Kátia Celina da Silva Richetto, Universidade de Taubaté

Professor and Researcher in the Professional Master's Program in Education at the University of Taubaté (MPE – UNITAU). Chemical Engineer from the School of Engineering of Lorena, University of São Paulo (EEL-USP), with a Master’s in Mechanical Engineering from the São Paulo State University (UNESP), PhD in Materials Engineering from EEL-USP, and a Specialization in Distance Education from the University of Taubaté (UNITAU). She is currently the director of the Institute of Basic Sciences (IBE) at UNITAU and participates in the Teacher Specialization Program (PED Brasil), an initiative of the Lemann Center for Educational Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Brazil, located at the Stanford Graduate School of Education, developed in partnership with the Instituto Canoa. 

References

ALBUQUERQUE BRAGA, M. D. C.; SANTOS, Â. C. T.; SILVA SOUZA, C. A construção da cidadania e o incentivo à participação social no processo de formação da cidade a partir de práticas pedagógicas construtivistas. Educação em Foco, v. 26, n. 50, p. 1-25, 2023.

AHMAD, C. N. C.; AMIRUL, N. J. The effect of the physical learning environment on students’ health, enjoyment and learning. Journal Pendidikan Sains Dan Matematik Malaysia, v. 7, n. 1, p. 47-55, 2017.

ATTARD, C. Research evaluation of matific mathematics learning resources: Project report. 2016.

BARRETT, P., DAVIES, F., ZHANG, Y.,;BARRETT, L. The Impact of Classroom Design on Pupils’ Learning: Final Results of a Holistic, Multi-Level Analysis. Building and Environment, 89, 118-133, 2015.

BOALER, J. Mentalidades matemáticas: estimulando o potencial dos estudantes por meio da matemática criativa, das mensagens inspiradoras e do ensino inovador. Penso Editora. 2017.

BOSSI, K. M. L.; SCHIMIGUEL, J. Metodologias ativas no ensino de Matemática: estado da arte. Research, Society and Development, v. 9, n. 4, p. e47942819-e47942819, 2020.

COHEN, E. G.; LOTAN, R. A. Planejando o trabalho em grupo: estratégias para salas de aula heterogêneas. Penso Editora, 2017.

DENG, C.; ZHAO, Z. The Effect of Childcare Facilities Spatial Definition Related to Child Development: A Literature Review. Asian Journal of Research in Education and Social Sciences, v. 5, n. 2, p. 164-169, 2023.

FERREIRA, W. J.; RICHETTO, K. C. da S; VEIGA, S. A. da; MOURA RIBEIRO, M.T. de; GOUVEA, E. J. Math phobia and maths anxiety: multidisciplinary aproaches for a more inclusive and equitable education in Brazil. Concilium, v. 23, n. 17, p. 663-677, 2023.

FLORES, T. M.; LOPES, Z. A.; URT, S. C. Vygotsky, Agnes Heller e Ciampa:: Aproximações teóricas sobre o processo de Identidade e Constituição Subjetiva. Educação em Foco, v. 27, n. 52, p. 1-12, 2024.

FREEMAN, S.; EDDY, S. L.; MCDONOUGH, M.; SMITH, M. K.; OKOROAFOR, N.; JORDT, H.; WENDEROTH, M. P. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, v. 111, n. 23, p. 8410-8415, 2014.

IMMS, W.; BYERS, T. Impact of classroom design on teacher pedagogy and student engagement and performance in mathematics. Learning Environments Research, v. 20, p. 139-152, 2017.

MAYER, R. E. Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning?. American psychologist, v. 59, n. 1, p. 14, 2004.

MUSSI, R. F. de F.; FLORES, F. F.; ALMEIDA, C. B.. Pressupostos para a elaboração de relato de experiência como conhecimento científico. Revista práxis educacional, v. 17, n. 48, p. 60-77, 2021.

NAUDE, M.; MEIER, C. Elements of the physical learning environment that impact on the teaching and learning in South African Grade 1 classrooms. South African Journal of Education, v. 39, n. 1, 2019.

PUTEH, M.; CHE AHMAD, C. N.; MOHAMED NOH, N.; ADNAN, M.; IBRAHIM, M. H. The classroom physical environment and its relation to teaching and learning comfort level. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, v. 5, n. 3, p. 237-240, 2015.

SHULMAN, L. Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard educational review, v. 57, n. 1, p. 1-23, 1987.

SOLTANINEJAD, M.; BABAEI-POUYA, A.; POURSADEQIYAN, M.; FEIZ AREFI, M. Ergonomics factors influencing school education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A literature review. Work, v. 68, n. 1, p. 69-75, 2021.

STRUYVEN, K.; DOCHY, F.; JANSSENS, S. ‘Teach as you preach’: the effects of student‐centred versus lecture‐based teaching on student teachers’ approaches to teaching. European journal of teacher education, v. 33, n. 1, p. 43-64, 2010.

TALBERT, R.; MOR-AVI, A. A space for learning: An analysis of research on active learning spaces. Heliyon, v. 5, n. 12, 2019.

VAN REENEN, C.; KARUSSEIT, C. Classroom acoustics as a consideration for inclusive education in South Africa. South African Journal of Communication Disorders, v. 64, n. 1, p. 1-10, 2017.

WARD, A.; KO, M. E. Addressing Diversity in the Stanford Math Classroom: Suggestions and Resources. In: VPTL’s Identity in the Classroom Learning Community. Stanford, pp. 1-8, 2017.

WEINSTEIN, C. S.; NOVODVORSKY, I. Gestão da sala de aula: lições da pesquisa e da prática para trabalhar com adolescentes. Porto Alegre: AMGH, 2015.

Published

2026-04-30

How to Cite

Lessa, L. R. P., Ferreira, W. J., & Richetto, K. C. da S. (2026). Reconfiguring classroom layout as a tool for inclusion and equity in mathematics education. Educação Em Foco, 29(57), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.36704/eef.v29i57.9089

Issue

Section

Relato de experiência